Here are The Wise Nirbija's Words of Wisdom:
""Our paths split," 24-year-old Dimitrov, currently number 16 in the ATP rankings, told Bulgarian media on Friday. "We experienced wonderful moments together. I wish her much happiness and success in life and in tennis."
Your paths "split" long before it should never have been together, except for the purpose of the younger male 'sowing some wild oats'. lol
The truth is; Sharapova was 'robbing the cradle'. So might have found the union interesting and exciting
A younger male mating his 'mom' (female his age or older) is a recipe for disaster.
Because she is older (and is supposed to be more mature) 'mom' will always be tempted to tell her 'son' what to do, which is an avoidable challenge to the ego of the more dominant, male gender.
Ben Affleck had the same kinds of issues with his cougar 'mom': Jennifer Garner-ed him; and the younger Ben became Afflicted. lol.
Some of the responses to his epic rant:
Stop drinking the KoolAid buddy, Sharapova is only 4 years older than Dimitrov, not exactly robbing the cradle. And Garner is like 4 months older than Affleck, born in the same year, what a "cougar mom" right? (Seth R.)
Your comments are sexist. Want to see a problem? Look in the mirror. (lightoftruth3)
Nirbija's responses:
1) @Seth R.
You may want to learn some about human development.
Sharapova's 4 years older is like a generation older than Dimitrov.
Sharapova needs an OLDER male ... and fast!
When older males don't bother with females, the younger males, if they are wise, will make good note.
A female who is attracted to a younger male is a female who is stunted in her mental-mating development.
And of course a younger male does not mind the opportunity to 'sow some wild oats' in an older hole; it is better than mating his hands and fingers. lol
Females mature earlier than males.
That is why we have Ben Afflicted; he was Garner-ed by his 'mom', who gets in the bad habit of telling him what he should and should not do.
No way a younger female is inclined to be that rude to an older male.
2) "@lightoftruth3
'sexist'? what the hell does that even mean?
Males and females ARE DIFFERENT!
Their roles & responsibilities in life and in society ARE DIFFERENT.
So what you call 'sexist' is due only to your warped, unnatural view of the world, and of what it means to be male and female.
Nirbija, you may want to learn something about human development and human sexual behavior. I mean the real deals and not just your rather ridiculous comments. You must be about 20 years old, judging from your comments. There are just about as many types of relationships as there are people. Women who are four years older than a man are not "cougars" of necessity. I do not know what Sharapova is like, do you? I think that both Sharapova's and Dimitrov's tennis games suffered during their relationship because they were not focused on their careers. They needed to make a decision between careers and the myriad other things involved in any relationship. Hopefully now, they can both move on and focus upon their tennis careers and improve their tennis games. (RUFUS)
Nirbija again:
@RUFUS
If we are to accept your "There are just about as many types of relationships as there are people", then if you are wise, you will also accept that not all of your "relationships" are going to be wise and constructive.
And we are here pointing out why the older Sharapova & the younger male, was one of your "relationships" that are are not constructive and are least likely to succeed.
Also, since Sharapova NATURALLY desires a mate, and must feels her clock ticking away, tennis shouldn't be her focus.
Finding a suitable mate SHOULD BE Sharapova's focus; because offspring born from 'old' eggs are more vulnerable to defects.
Dimitrov can go focus on his tennis; he has time; and he has not much to show by way of tennis success as yet.
My own humble question to Nirbija The Great and others with similar views:
IF IT'S AN UNDENIABLE TRUTH THAT GIRLS MATURE FASTER THAN BOYS, SHOULDN'T GIRLS BE ALLOWED TO DRIVE CARS EARLIER THAN BOYS? IF IT IS AN ESTABLISHED FACT THAT WOMEN REACH MATURITY EARLIER THAN MEN, SHOULDN'T WOMEN BE ALLOWED TO VOTE AT A YOUNGER AGE THAN MEN?
Somehow, I have a nagging suspicion that Nirbija & his followers will hit the roof upon hearing these suggestions! To them, the female of the species' earlier maturity should be taken seriously ONLY when the results suit their male counterparts. If any privilege is granted to women based upon such "truths", then all hell will break loose!
Oh, another thought: Women tend to live longer than men. Women also reach their sexual peaks later in life than men. I can think of valid reasons galore for women to date younger men!
